We believe that parents deserve to have assurance of any therapeutic agenda involving their child. In such an intensely values-laden area of psychotherapy as sexuality, no therapist should have free rein to support the child in claiming any lifestyle option he chooses. The false claim of many therapists that they are operating with "complete therapeutic neutrality" on such values-laden issues rightly frustrates parents, and in practice - is not even workable, or in fact honest. Directly clarifying our view of homosexuality to parents will reduce their anxiety about the therapeutic process and facilitate their own "backing off" from pressuring their son about his lifestyle.
At the first session, the teenage client is told clearly where I'm coming from, and we attempt to establish a working alliance within that boundary.
Confidentiality
The issue of confidentiality is especially important, requiring the therapist's ongoing sensitivity in preserving a working atmosphere of uncompromised privacy. Limits of confidentiality should be spelled out, including the therapist's obligation to inform parents about self-destructive behaviors, with special mention of dangerous sexual activities.
The teenager may have already discovered the power of gay advocacy in neutralizing his own parents' influence. Avoid debate; rather than try to convince him, return to his own experience, listening in terms of the assertion-vs.-shame conflict.
Fundamental to reparative therapy is the understanding that homosexuality is a symptom of this A«S conflict. Without making the diminishment of homosexuality the agreed-upon goal of therapy, the therapist can still focus on assisting the teen solve his day-to-day problems, which often involve interpersonal conflicts, and those conflicts often prove to be Assertion-Shame conflicts. The client will soon discover that much of his assertion needs are direct or indirect expressions of his masculine drives. Rather than being a "covert" therapeutic strategy, it is advisable that this understanding be clearly explained to the client
"Expose" Versus "Impose"
If the client disagrees with the therapist's views on homosexuality, then the foundation of the working alliance can be to "agree to disagree." In other words, the therapist exposes his views on homosexuality, but he doesn't impose them on the client. We explain that we see homosexual attractions as an adaptation to certain early emotional deprivations, and that the attempt to compensate for ("repair") these early deprivations is, in our view, the reason for the client's same-sex attractions. Further, we explain that with corrective experiences in the present, those attractions may diminish.
It is important to remember that many homosexual clients, feeling betrayed by their earliest relationships, are hyper-distrustful and alert to manipulation. This is especially true for the adolescent client who is negotiating with an adult. By openly explaining his views on homosexuality, the therapist avoids imposing his ideas and clarifies that the client is free to disagree.
A«S Conflict:
Begin And End With His Experience
The high level of narcissism common to all adolescents requires any and all therapeutic interventions to be closely linked to their personal experience. Typically, the teenager's personal frame of reference must be the beginning and end of any intervention. This means that we will not focus primarily on the question of "gay" versus "not gay," but instead, we will address the development of the confident, assertive, manly, and strong person that he himself wants to be--overcoming the "false self" that harbors feelings of intimidation, inhibition, unmanliness, and hidden shame.